From: Chris W. <ch...@cw...> - 2002-09-13 14:12:16
|
* Ray Zimmerman (rz...@co...) [020912 11:26]: > I'm not sure what the projections are regarding the inclusion of > ESPOPS functionality into SPOPS, but I was wondering what you thought > about me putting ESPOPS on CPAN in the mean time? > > If you think it's a good idea, do you have any suggestions for a > better name for it? Is it something you'd want me to put inside the > SPOPS namespace somewhere? I have no problems with it. I apologize for not including it in the eons since you announced it, but I haven't had that particular itch yet :-) As for naming, that's up to you. SPOPS isn't an official namespace in the CPAN sense, but it might make sense for people looking around for the first time. I don't want to cause you renaming problems, however. I don't have any ideas for names. IIRC I was going to call this SPOPS::Inheritable, but that's not quite there I think. What does your team call it? > On a related note ... do you have an up-to-date SPOPS to do list somewhere? Not explicitly. My current plan is: - Finish writing tests so that every major class in the system is represented. (Almost done with this.) This is broader than it sounds because various things shake out as a result. (As is happing right now with security stuff.) - Convert the rules, and make class generation behaviors, to use Class::Observable instead of the built-in scheme. - After that is working, I want to finally change the linking/relationship declarations and behavior as you outlined. After that... it's time for 1.0 I think :-) Chris -- Chris Winters (ch...@cw...) Building enterprise-capable snack solutions since 1988 |