From: Chris W. <ch...@cw...> - 2002-06-25 03:34:59
|
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 11:17, Ray Zimmerman wrote: > I like it. The name 'update' is definitely too generic. I already ran > into a class that already had an update() method doing something else. The ayes have it then. > Another thing that I thought of is that we should probably allow > refetch() to be called without any parameters, in which case it would > re-fetch all fields instead of throwing an exception. That was a ten-second implementation :-) Good idea. > Bummer ... that's what I was afraid of. Well, we want you to know > that SPOPS is a tremendous benefit to our project. With ESPOPS it's > doing most of what we need it to, and the rest has been relatively > easy to build on top. Thanks. This is nice to hear every once in a while :-) Chris -- Chris Winters (ch...@cw...) Building enterprise-capable snack solutions since 1988. |