From: Ray Z. <rz...@co...> - 2002-06-21 15:19:25
|
At 11:47 PM -0400 6/20/02, Chris Winters wrote: >How is 'field_update()' for a method name instead of 'update()'? I like it. The name 'update' is definitely too generic. I already ran into a class that already had an update() method doing something else. Another thing that I thought of is that we should probably allow refetch() to be called without any parameters, in which case it would re-fetch all fields instead of throwing an exception. The difference between ... $object->refetch; ... and ... $class = ref $object; $object = $class->fetch( $object-> id ); ... is that the former would not do pre/post-fetch actions and any other references to the object would still point to the (now updated) object. >PS - As for the other items: someday.... Daily paying nonperl work is >eating up lots of time. There are days when I miss perl... Bummer ... that's what I was afraid of. Well, we want you to know that SPOPS is a tremendous benefit to our project. With ESPOPS it's doing most of what we need it to, and the rest has been relatively easy to build on top. Thanks, -- Ray Zimmerman / e-mail: rz...@co... / 428-B Phillips Hall Sr Research / phone: (607) 255-9645 / Cornell University Associate / FAX: (815) 377-3932 / Ithaca, NY 14853 |