From: Chris W. <ch...@cw...> - 2001-11-28 12:49:20
|
* Andreas Nolte (And...@Be...) [011128 03:04]: > Hi Chris, > > it took me a while to find out, why I exactly do not see this as the > solution to all performance issues. > > The problem arises, when you have a larger system ( right now we have > 161.000 records in sys_security... ) and use ( maybe misuse ;-) ) the > security system to provide for a multi client system where sys_security sort > of works like some client row in a table. > > In this setup you have queries, which return a larger result which gets > boiled down within the security system to return only the records of one > client. Therefore most fetches waste quite a lot of resources. Same thing > with fetch_count... > > What we will try is using sys_security whith skip_security like this: > > call fetch_group with a join of the data table to sys_security on the > relevant queries. > > We hope, that this does it - more later. Great! I'm very curious to hear the effects this has. Thanks for braving the waters :-) Chris -- Chris Winters (ch...@cw...) Building enterprise-capable snack solutions since 1988. |