Re: [Openh323gk-developer] vqueue
H.323 Gatekeeper for VoIP and videconferencing
Brought to you by:
willamowius
From: Zygmuntowicz M. <m.z...@on...> - 2005-09-04 10:16:58
|
You can user either RadAliasAuth or SQLAuth to perform number rewriting (call redirection). RadAliasAuth gives you access to any backend that is supported by your RADIUS server. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Saunders" <jam...@ho...> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 3:37 AM > Thanks for the quick reply Jan. Much obliged. The current problem at hand > is I need a routing solution for aproximately 140,000 unique dialed digit > patterns (npanxx's). I think gnugk is great and would be even greater if I > could figure out how to do this. My current routing solution is the > internal tables and two stage rewrites w/ RewriteE164 and GWRewrites > outbound. The server however did not like my 140,000 RewriteE164's and came > to a virtual stand still trying to load the .ini. Is there a solution to > this? I'd love to have either vqueues work w/ Setup messages, or an > SQLRoute module of sorts that would allow Rewrite's to dialeddigits based on > a lookup in an sql db. I've been over the gnugk documentation scratching my > brain, pondering how to achieve this and haven't come up with a solution as > of yet. I should probably explain my server config. I have it accepting > unregistered calls and doing authentication on matching pins found with > RewriteE164's. It rewrites the client pin to a routing block of sorts > denoted by a code, *10# would be one block. I then associated *10# with a > permanant endpoint and a GWRewrite to rewrite the *10# to the pin required > by the endpoint and viola, signal routing. There is no RAS (inconvenient to > require gateways to register to a gatekeeper) & signalling is on 1720 as it > is essentially acting as an ip to ip gateway or signalling proxy. > > James Saunders > > >>From: Jan Willamowius <ja...@wi...> >>Reply-To: ope...@li... >>To: ope...@li... >>Subject: Re: [Openh323gk-developer] vqueue >>Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:31:50 +0200 >> >>Its true, currently only calls via ARQ are supported on virtual queues. >>The answer why is pretty simple: Implementing it for Setups is a bit >>more difficult than for ARQs and nobody needed it bad enough so far. >> >>Regards, >>Jan >> >> >>James Saunders wrote: >> > I am using gnugk simply as a signalling gateway... no arq's... All >>calls >> > start simply w/ a setup message. I've read in the manual that you can >>only >> > use vqueue's with ARQ's. It would be GREAT if I could use them w/ >>Setup's. >> > Is this possible? And if not could you perhaps give a brief >>explanation as >> > to why? >> > >> > James Saunders >> >>-- >>Jan Willamowius, ja...@wi..., http://www.willamowius.de/ |