RE: dqGOOP beta

[Christopher R. <chr...@ya...>]

Looks impressive!

---
EULA
1) This is a private email, and although the views expressed within it =
may
not be purely my own, unless specifically referenced I do not suggest =
they
are necessarily associated with anyone else including, but not limited =
to,
my employer(s).
2) This email has NOT been scanned for virii - attached file(s), if any, =
are
provided as is. By copying, detaching and/or opening attached files, you
agree to indemnify the sender of such responsibility.
3) Because e-mail can be altered electronically, the integrity of this
communication cannot be guaranteed.

-----Original Message-----
From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf =
Of
Brian Gangloff
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:13 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: Re: dqGOOP beta


Dou...@mk... wrote:

>What performance benchmarks comparing OpenGOOP and dqGOOP can you share =

>with us?  Doug
> =20
>
The attached spreadsheet has data from running the test classes that are =

in the zip file.  I plan on running the test under more controlled=20
conditions, but the results are typical of what I have been seeing. =
Brian