From: Martin H. <mar...@mh...> - 2005-01-14 10:18:28
|
Hi Mark, Mark Balla wrote: > The Wisconsin User Group Steering comity Just recently ask our District > Sales Manager this NI Visa question. > He did some research and replied with this response. [...] > Today, our licensing policy DOES NOT require a customer to pay a licensing > fee for NI-VISA if the deployment target contains NI hardware or software > written using NI development software. In the scenario where you have a > LabVIEW VI or EXE talking on a built-in serial port, National Instruments > allows the first 10 distributions for free and after that we require a > licensing fee. We are about to change our licensing policy to allow up to > 100 distributions per application for free and after that require a > license. [...] Oh yes, i know that, but have you read the licence agreements? I only found that NI supplies different licence agreements on their FTP server, all targeting NI-VISA. I havn't read them all, but up to now I did't find anything about 10 or 100 free installations. For me it is actually unclear - which of the licence agreements have to be used (for which labview version or for which hardware or whatever). - where the licence agreement is which correctly and clearly explains how many installations can be used. - how a developer should be able to ensure that only the number of allowed installations ere exists in the world. - where is clearly explained under what circumstances a developer can distribute the VISA runtime installer. (only when creating an installer with LabVIEW7 as explained in one of the licences? - what is with LV 5, 6, 6.1 and 7.1?) - If NI changes the licencing issue, whats about older versions/installations. ... I can understand NI, that they wants to mainly support their hardware and I also understand, that they would have a fee if anyone is using their software without using their hardware. That's not the topic here - but we all have paid for LabVIEW and we all should be able to use the basics of our PC and operating system (which we also have paid for). -- 73 de Martin, DL5NAH |