RE: VariantConfig suggestion....

[Jim K. <jk...@ja...>]

Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
>
> Jim Kring wrote:
>
>> We cannot change the behavior of the "found?" output simply
>> because people
>> rely on its present behavior.  However, wee could rename this to "all
>> found?" and add an additional output called "any found?".
>>
>> Anyone like or dislike this idea?
>
> I would have added an input which defines how the found should behave
> and with a default which works like the current implementation.
>
> But your solution is in fact at least as good.
>

I was thinking that having both outputs would allow users to get both
pieces of information without having to call the VI twice (which might
slow things down when reading large files).

-Jim