Re: [Openfastdotnet-users] MulticastInputStream and ByteBuffer

[shariq m. <sha...@gm...>]

Yes, we usually convert it from java version but now we are working on
optimization so it is changing now. their are a few areas which need
attention to optimize the context object.

About multicast class, that is not functional but this is something which
can be implemented without need of too much coding but when it was ported,
those classes were their, in actual; implementations have variations in
different scenarios in contrast to java version. Some feeds skip 5 bytes
as preamble data and some dont do that. Anyways we would add a few exchange
specific samples this week which will clarify the implementation.


2010/12/14 <ope...@li...>

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Henry Conceição" <hen...@gm...>
> To: ope...@li...
> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:39:52 -0200
> Subject: MulticastInputStream and ByteBuffer
> Hi,
>
> It looks like that these two classes are half implemented only. What
> is the approach that you guys usually follow on those situations? Just
> port from java source?
>
> Cheers,
> Henry Conceição
>
>
>
>


-- 
*
Shariq
*