From: Joerg H. <in...@jh...> - 2004-07-29 15:29:26
|
Hi, Jim Peters wrote: > Okay, a little more on the documentation licence situation. > Debian-legal have a few objections to the 2.0 version of the Creative > Commons Attribution-Sharealike licence: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01193.html > > In other words they are still debugging it, but I think Creative > Commons will get there in the end. > > I've created a new page for the web-site (just on a working copy of > the site for the moment) clarifying things a little, I hope: > > http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/wrk/doc/licence.html > > Does anyone have any objections to what I'm attempting to do here? For me it is OK. > Really I'm trying to codify the informal basis on which we've been > working previously. Trying to be legally correct is a minor > nightmare, but hopefully this will work. You might wonder why I am > bothering, but it could save a whole load of potential complications > later on. I fully agree. > If no-one objects to this approach (or has any better ideas), I will > check this modification into CVS and release it to the live site. Just to make sure: All documentation, schematics and pcb layouts will have the CC license and all software/firmware also? Or does the software still have the GNU license? Regards, Joerg |