On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Russell Balest wrote:
>
> I'm trying to figure out if opencxx is suitable for the following task:
>
> I want to utilize opencxx to translate existing C++ class definitions
> ( plus an opencxx annotation such as "metaclass Serializable") to C++
> code and then compile with g++ in the end. In the process of
> translation I want to generate 'serialize' or 'marshall' methods on my
> "Serializable" classes. Very similar to what you get in Java when you
> declare that a class implements serializable.
> Has anyone done this?
I think I can recall somebody talking about it on this list. You may want
to search archives.
> Does this sound like something that opencxx can do?
Yes.
> In particular, I must compile the transformed code with g++ as
> I'm part of a larger build process that I don't control.
>
> I get the impression that opencxx doesn't actually emit translated
> code that can then be compiled with g++.
Where does this impression come from?
> Am I wrong about that?
The code emitted by occ should compile fine with g++. If you find
otherwise, please report it here.
BR
Grzegorz
> Thanks for any information or examples,
> Russell Balest
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Opencxx-users mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencxx-users
>
>
##################################################################
# Grzegorz Jakacki Huada Electronic Design #
# Senior Engineer, CAD Dept. 1 Gaojiayuan, Chaoyang #
# tel. +86-10-64365577 x2074 Beijing 100015, China #
# Copyright (C) 2004 Grzegorz Jakacki, HED. All Rights Reserved. #
##################################################################
|
