Re: [Opencxx-users] "make check" fail on branch rel_2_9 with gcc 4.0.1 in C++ headers

[Stefan S. <se...@sy...>]

Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 06:03 -0400, Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> 
>>after applying patch for bits/cpp_type_traits.h known problem
>>
>>"make check" fails
>>1- /usr/include/c++/4.0.1/bits/stl_algobase.h:164
>>2- /usr/include/c++/4.0.1/ext/mt_allocator.h:498
>>3- /usr/include/c++/4.0.1/ext/mt_allocator.h:544
>>
>>1- is
>> std::__iter_swap<
>>         __are_same<_ValueType1, _ValueType2>::__value
>>      && __are_same<_ValueType1 &, _ReferenceType1>::__value
>>      && __are_same<_ValueType2 &, _ReferenceType2>::__value
>>                 >::iter_swap(__a, __b);
> 
> 
> made this one to pass, if the template parameter of __iter_swap is
> put between parenthesis in stl_algobase.h
> 
> that is
>  std::__iter_swap<(
>          __are_same<_ValueType1, _ValueType2>::__value
>       && __are_same<_ValueType1 &, _ReferenceType1>::__value
>       && __are_same<_ValueType2 &, _ReferenceType2>::__value
>                  )>::iter_swap(__a, __b);


Good ! That helps to understand what is going on. It appears this way you
give a hint to occ to interpret the content of the parens as a primary-expression,
I think.

Unfortunately the libstdc++ maintainer's are unlikely to accept patches
to satisfy occ ;-)

Regards,
	Stefan