Re: [Opencxx-users] Porting OpenCXX

[Grzegorz J. <ja...@ac...>]

Thomas Engelmeier wrote:
> At 21:50 Uhr +0800 05.11.2004, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:
> 
> Hi Grzegorz,
> 
>>> - with the normal automake / autoconf / make chain there is a problem 
>>> that in most of the makefiles libtool is invoked, not something 
>>> configurable (glibtool on OS X) or the local libtool ($OPENCXX/libtool).
>>
>>
>> You mean during building OpenC++ or compiling with OpenC++?
> 
> 
> Both. Most of the Makefiles refer to libtool even if $LIBTOOL is 
> defined, and the occ2 script does the same...
> 
>>> - compiled, one of the samples (IIRC verbose2) produces an coredump. 
>>> The problem is the sample tries to write to cout at static 
>>> initialisation time. The init order is _not_ guaranteed by the ANSI 
>>> Standard - while it is desirable std::cout is usuable all the time, 
>>> the only thing that is guaranteed is it is usuable when program 
>>> execution reaches the first line of main();
>>>
>>> - With an more rigid ANSI compliant standard library implementation 
>>> (Metrowerks Codewarrior) there are compile errors due to missing 
>>> namespace using clauses in a whole bunch of files
>>
>>
>> That's very valuable feedback. Could you send a patch agains 2.8 for 
>> these?
> 
> 
> If I figure out how to diff directories, yes ;-).

diff -r

> Whom should I send it to? (I'm not a fan of huge compiler error or 
> patchfile attachment on mailinglists)...

It's OK on this list.

BR
Grzegorz