Re: [Opencxx-users] Porting OpenCXX

[Thomas E. <te-...@en...>]

At 21:50 Uhr +0800 05.11.2004, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:

Hi Grzegorz,

>>- with the normal automake / autoconf / make chain there is a 
>>problem that in most of the makefiles libtool is invoked, not 
>>something configurable (glibtool on OS X) or the local libtool 
>>($OPENCXX/libtool).
>
>You mean during building OpenC++ or compiling with OpenC++?

Both. Most of the Makefiles refer to libtool even if $LIBTOOL is 
defined, and the occ2 script does the same...

>>- compiled, one of the samples (IIRC verbose2) produces an 
>>coredump. The problem is the sample tries to write to cout at 
>>static initialisation time. The init order is _not_ guaranteed by 
>>the ANSI Standard - while it is desirable std::cout is usuable all 
>>the time, the only thing that is guaranteed is it is usuable when 
>>program execution reaches the first line of main();
>>
>>- With an more rigid ANSI compliant standard library implementation 
>>(Metrowerks Codewarrior) there are compile errors due to missing 
>>namespace using clauses in a whole bunch of files
>
>That's very valuable feedback. Could you send a patch agains 2.8 for these?

If I figure out how to diff directories, yes ;-).
Whom should I send it to? (I'm not a fan of huge compiler error or 
patchfile attachment on mailinglists)...

Regards,
	Tom_E