RE: [Synopsis-devel] Re: [Opencxx-users] refining the Synopsis AP Is

[Markus E. <Mar...@we...>]

> * keystone is licensed under GPL, and thus not suitable for a 
>   framework that should be usable in proprietary settings, too.

Can this license issue be resolved if the Keystone project would agree to use the "Runtime GPL"?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html

Can the discussion "(L)GPL and C++ templates issue" help here?
http://groups.google.de/groups?group=comp.lang.c%2B%2B.moderated&threadm=4174046c%241_2%40news.bluewin.ch

Regards,
Markus