From: Stefan S. <se...@sy...> - 2004-10-28 00:22:31
|
Markus Elfring wrote: >>Can you show where the syntax tree becomes a graph ? It never occured to >>me that syntax would have an intrinsic graph structure (as long as you >>don't start to connect symbol declarations with their actual use, but >>that's exactly what the ASG is about). > > > I can not show it. The specific term is rarely used by Keystone. > It seems that it is related to other documents as a background. > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cis?q=%22abstract+syntax+graph%22 well, that looks like sloppy use of the language, which is quite unfortunate. Please try to conceive of an example of code that maps to a graph on the syntax level. Until I see that I'd rather insist on the conventional use of the above acronyms, may be putting a glossary into the docs to make sure people understand what we are referring to. Regards, Stefan |