Re: [Opencxx-users] Re: [Synopsis-devel] constant expression anal yzer and 'sizeof'

[David A. <dav...@rc...>]

Stefan Seefeld <sse...@ar...> writes:

> Hey Grzegorz,
>
>> From: Grzegorz Jakacki [mailto:ja...@ac...]
>> Sent: October 12, 2004 07:12
>
>> Pls. google for the answer, this subject has been beaten to 
>> death many 
>> times on different fora and seems to be religious issue, no point in 
>> bringing it here.
>
> The topic doesn't appear to be as dead as you make it sound
> (as this very thread proves). May I remind you that you were the one
> bringing the topic up, so all people are asking now is why you insist
> on not wanting to use LGPL.
> It seems clear that *the* answer doesn't exist (not on google by any
> means), so the point of the question as I interpret it was about
> what your reasons are to refuse it.
> By the way, you asked for comments on potential licenses for future
> OpenCxx versions about a month ago. Was there any follow-up ?

FWIW, the reasons that Boost doesn't accept LGPL are at
http://tinyurl.com/7x86d

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com