From: Stefan S. <sse...@ar...> - 2004-09-27 12:45:16
|
Hi Grzegorz, > From: Grzegorz Jakacki [mailto:ja...@he...] > Sent: September 27, 2004 04:29 > I don't understand what you are challenging. Clients have to > fulfill certain > obligations if they link against LGPL-ed library: [...] > Section 6: yes, that's exactly the point. As long as you fulfill these obligations you are fine. Do you see any problems with section 6 ? It seems to me to be mostly a technical question, i.e. as long as you are able to either keep the LGPL-covered code in a dll (and thus allow users to replace it as long as they stay binary compatible) or you distribute the necessary infrastructure (such as the full source code) of the entire code to allow users to relink it, you should be fine. I really don't see why this shouldn't be possible. Regards, Stefan |