Re: [Opencxx-users] OpenC++ License

[Grzegorz J. <ja...@ac...>]

SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to think about a wording like the following.
> 
> 
>>[...] Any copy of this software or
>>of any derivative work must include the above copyright notice of   
>>Xerox Corporation, this paragraph and the one after it. [...]
> 
> 
> 1. The sentence specifies that this license variant must be repeated. 
 > Are there any legal reasons that allow to stop that repetition?

I don't think so anybody can do it without Xerox's aproval (relicensing).

> 2. Which code changes are not "derivative work" in this context?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work
 >
> 3. How can license proliferation be resolved?

I am looking for lawyer's help on these issues.

BR
Grzegorz