Re: [Opencxx-users] OpenC++ License

[SF M. E. <el...@us...>]

Hello,

I would like to think about a wording like the following.

> [...] Any copy of this software or
> of any derivative work must include the above copyright notice of   
> Xerox Corporation, this paragraph and the one after it. [...]

1. The sentence specifies that this license variant must be repeated. Are there any legal reasons that allow to stop that repetition?

2. Which code changes are not "derivative work" in this context?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work

3. How can license proliferation be resolved?

Best regards,
Markus Elfring