From: Grzegorz J. <ja...@ac...> - 2004-09-11 17:20:45
|
Stefan Seefeld wrote: [...] >>> Grzegorz, what about my other mail ? Do you agree to make the change >>> I propose, i.e. let 'occ' display the translated >>> ptree if no '-p' option is given ? >> >> >> >> Sorry for the delay. >> >> First, occ already has '-s' option. I assume the output you >> implemented is better suited for e.g. testing. If so, please go ahead, >> just put it under an option, preferably a long one ('--...'), that way >> we minimize chances to accidentally hit some "well-known" one-letter >> option. > > > yes, '-s' is already there. My proposal is to change the semantics such > that it will behave as it always did when '-p' is specified, and else > display the ptree after the translation instead of before. Yes, that makes sense to me, pls. go ahead. BR Grzegorz > > I honestly strongly doubt anybody would ever notice, as '-s' seems to > me to be a debugging / testing / learning tool only. > > The change I'd like to make is thus trivial and involves only three lines > of code that are moved down a bit :-) > > Regards, > Stefan > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > Opencxx-users mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencxx-users |