Re: [Opencxx-users] Next tasks

[Stefan S. <se...@sy...>]

Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:

> Ideally we could set up one common repo for the core part of opencxx 
> (nicknamed "OpenC++ Core) to be used by both OpenC++ and Synopsis.

ideally, yes. But no matter what we end up doing, I strongly believe
the opencxx code as it exists today should get this added, too, so
we can use it as a reference. Whenever we are unsure whether the
results we are seing elsewhere are correct, we can at least check
with the old occ tests whether it's a regression or whether it has
always been there.

>> Grzegorz, what about my other mail ? Do you agree to make the change I 
>> propose, i.e. let 'occ' display the translated
>> ptree if no '-p' option is given ?
> 
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> First, occ already has '-s' option. I assume the output you implemented 
> is better suited for e.g. testing. If so, please go ahead, just put it 
> under an option, preferably a long one ('--...'), that way we minimize 
> chances to accidentally hit some "well-known" one-letter option.

yes, '-s' is already there. My proposal is to change the semantics such
that it will behave as it always did when '-p' is specified, and else
display the ptree after the translation instead of before.

I honestly strongly doubt anybody would ever notice, as '-s' seems to
me to be a debugging / testing / learning tool only.

The change I'd like to make is thus trivial and involves only three lines
of code that are moved down a bit :-)

Regards,
		Stefan