Re: [Opencxx-users] Next tasks

[Grzegorz J. <ja...@ac...>]

Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> 
>> Those language constructs are the one of OpenC++, right.
>> Do you have an idea/suggestion of the structure of the test directory.
>> For example,
>> here following ISO/IEC 14882

If I can comment on this: I think that directory layout is not that much 
important. What is important is to have most cases covered by tests, and 
for that purpose your list of features is a perfect reference. However 
if the tests go into one directory or into several ones, it is much up 
to the implementor (however personally I always try to restrain myself 
from overengineering).

> [...]
> 
> did you have a look into these ? I'd be interested in putting them
> into synopsis' testing framework and, if it's ok with everybody here
> into opencxx, too. 

Ideally we could set up one common repo for the core part of opencxx 
(nicknamed "OpenC++ Core) to be used by both OpenC++ and Synopsis.

For the information of everybody: Stefan and myself are discussing now 
how we can join efforts of OpenC++ and Synopsis projects to advance the 
functionality of the code that is shared by both projects.

> Grzegorz, what about my other mail ? 
> Do you agree to make the change I propose, i.e. let 'occ' display the translated
> ptree if no '-p' option is given ?

Sorry for the delay.

First, occ already has '-s' option. I assume the output you implemented 
is better suited for e.g. testing. If so, please go ahead, just put it 
under an option, preferably a long one ('--...'), that way we minimize 
chances to accidentally hit some "well-known" one-letter option.

BR
Grzegorz