From: <se...@in...> - 2004-09-07 18:59:11
|
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 20:13, Stefan Seefeld wrote: > Gilles J. Seguin wrote: > > > About 'my branch', I am puzzle. > > Does this branch is in opencxx or synopsis. > > If in opencxx, I was under the impression that modification in CVS > > where sending email to ope...@li.... > > What is the name of the branch. I may not be aware of a lot of > > work you have been doing. > > I am tracking through syn...@fr... > > yeah, I'm talking about synopsis. Sorry if that wasn't clear. > And again, half of my checkins don't show up on the synopsis-changes > list as the diffs are so big that it wouldn't make sense to mail > them. I'll patch the commit-email.pl script some day to skip the > diffs if they exceed some size... Well, watcher that watch half the time is no fun. If we look at mailing list like <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/2004-q3/> choosing <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/2004-q3/msg00576.html> We have: - Modified files: - Added files: - Log message: - Patches: Here is the interesting modification. * * Do not send the patch, but a reference to the patch(es). * * They succeed to mystified my again. The loginfo file, contains the filter log_accum that they have replace with log_accum_bugzillafied, which I can not found the source/reference to it, sorry. That email was for saying, they have a mechanism for sending huge "reference" to patch. have fun, gilles |