Re: [Opencxx-users] Missing ".so" in .la file

[Grzegorz J. <ja...@ac...>]

Thanks, Gilles. I rebuilt everything and it is ok, the problem must have 
stemed from mixing files generated by different versions of libtool.

BR
Grzegorz

Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 07:37, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>This is a fragment of some libocc_mop.la file created by
>>libtool 1.5.6:
> 
> 
> I have the same version here.
> And I do have the .so
> 
> If you cd in .libs directory, does the files have it.
> change directory back in directory opencxx where are the *.la .
> $ rm *.la
> $ make
> Suppose to relink.
> Does the command show
> -o .libs/libocc_mop.so.0.0.0
> 
> When you do ./configure add the -C option.
> $ cd top_builddir
> $ rm config.cache
> $ $(top_srcdir)/configure -C  #may be other things also
> $ grep libltdl_cv_shlibext * config.cache
> libltdl_cv_shlibext=${libltdl_cv_shlibext=.so}
> 
> hope this help
> 
> 
>>       # The name that we can dlopen(3).
>>       dlname='libocc_mop.0'
>>
>>       # Names of this library.
>>       library_names='libocc_mop.0.0.0 libocc_mop.0 libocc_mop'
>>
>>       # The name of the static archive.
>>       old_library='libocc_mop.a'
>>
>>Why no '.so' in dlname and library_names ???
>>
>>Thanks
>>Grzegorz
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Opencxx-users mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencxx-users