Re: [Opencxx-users] future directions

[SF M. E. <el...@us...>]

> ... The generated tree could be visited in terms
> of ptree, *as well* as a typed syntax tree.

How do you think to map a C++ grammar that is defined by EBNF to a detailed class hierarchy?
A lot of specifications from the syntax may be good candidates for different classes. Their interfaces can be designed with OMG IDL.

This top-down approach can meet with the current class library of OpenC++ somewhere in the middle.