Re: [Opencxx-users] future directions

[SF M. E. <el...@us...>]

> > (5) At this point we will have usable, type-safe interface.
> >     Moreover, clients not satisfied with this interface
> >     (e.g. those who prefer multiary "+") will have a chance
> >     to reuse it nonintrusively or just write another
> >     interface to Ptree structure from scratch.
> 
> That is a good point ! The generated tree could be visited in terms
> of ptree, *as well* as a typed syntax tree. A little like the other
> poster referring to the different DOM APIs...

Several internet browsers and other tools can process XML trees by the document object model.
Should their implementations be adjusted and reused for OpenC++ purposes?
How much do they have in common with "Ptrees"?