Re: [Opencxx-users] parse errors on valid C++

[SF M. E. <el...@us...>]

> [...]
> On an unrelated note: as you know I'm quite interested into the efford
> to separate the different opencxx layers.
> As I don't have any theoretical background in compiler / parser techniques,
> I'm wondering about the nature of all the ptree related business:
> As far as I understand only the very first steps are related to a
> parse tree proper. Already the construction of things like 'PtreeNamespaceAlias'
> nodes belongs into the 'syntax tree' domain, right ?
> [...]

Should the following key words be discussed?
1. Abstract syntax tree (AST)
2. Language syntax tree (LST)
3. Semantic resolution tree (RST)
4. Interpretation syntax tree (IST)
5. Code generation syntax tree (CST)
6. Symbol table
7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parser