Re: [Opencxx-users] Makefile.am fixes

[Grzegorz J. <ja...@he...>]

My last e-mail requires a fix. Sorry:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:

[...]
> With decomposition into 'Walker' (abstract iface) and 'OpencxxWalker'
> (implementation) I can can be sure that whatever (derived) object is at
> the end of 'OpencxxWalker*' pointer, it behaves just like 'OpencxxWalker'
> object.
>
> On the other hand (new) 'Walker' is abstract, so there is nothing
> like "Walker object", consequently 'OpencxxWalker*' pointer does not

like "Walker object", consequently 'Walker*' pointer does not

> imply any assumptions about the pointee behaviour.

BR
Grzegorz

>
> Surely current walker hierarchy in OpenC++ violates LSP, but it should
> not take much to get it straight.
>
> Have I convinced you?
>
> Greetings
> Grzegorz
>
> ##################################################################
> # Grzegorz Jakacki                       Huada Electronic Design #
> # Senior Engineer, CAD Dept.              1 Gaojiayuan, Chaoyang #
> # tel. +86-10-64365577 x2074               Beijing 100015, China #
> # Copyright (C) 2002 Grzegorz Jakacki, HED. All Rights Reserved. #
> ##################################################################
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opencxx-users mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencxx-users
>
>

##################################################################
# Grzegorz Jakacki                       Huada Electronic Design #
# Senior Engineer, CAD Dept.              1 Gaojiayuan, Chaoyang #
# tel. +86-10-64365577 x2074               Beijing 100015, China #
# Copyright (C) 2002 Grzegorz Jakacki, HED. All Rights Reserved. #
##################################################################