Re: [Opencxx-users] Makefile.am fixes

[Yann D. <yd...@us...>]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:04:26AM +0800, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:
> Thanks for your contribution, I reviewed it shortly below. Will you have
> time to commit those changes to CVS on SF?

I can find the time :)

> > - a test for an allocation, which I inserted some time ago when
> > investigating a problem (dont remember the details)
> 
> Is this necessary? Standard mandates exception when 'new' cannot allocate
> memory, so on conforming compiler the execution should never make it to
> the test.

OK, I can drop it.

> > -<DT><TT><B>opencxx.a</B></TT>
> > +<DT><TT><B>/usr/lib/libopenc++.a</B></TT>
> 
> (1) I am under impression that library names is 'libocc.a'

Right, fixed.

> (2) The library is not necessarily intalled in /usr/lib

Right as well.  To be correct the doc should be generated from an .in
file by configure, who can then substitute the path matching the local
installation.  I can arrange to do that if there are no objections.
Gasp, I always hated file renamings in CVS...

Regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson    <yd...@al...> |    Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <di...@de...> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:    <yan...@fr...> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>