From: Michael H. <ho...@sa...> - 2003-03-07 11:33:23
|
Grzegorz Jakacki <ja...@he...> writes: > Thank you very much for your contribution. The gcc-3.x compatibility issue > surfaces regularily. Recently Alexandre Tolmos has merged the old patch > prepared by Michael Buro addressing exactly this same problem, and is > currently in the phase of testing it on Compile Farm. > > This unfortunately means, that some work has been done twice. [...] > Next time, I would suggest that you first contact the mailing list or me > directly to discuss the contribution you would like to make. The project > resources are scarce and I would hate to waste time of any contributor. > > I am not sure if you are subscribing to the OpenC++ mailing list, since > gcc-3.x patch was discussed here. > [...] archived at [sourceforge.net] since Sep 2002. I am, in fact, subscribed to the list (and I even have a complete mailing-list archive dating back to May 1997), but I have not followed it closely during the few past months. Now it turns out I should have (but then again, it wasn't that much work). > Nevertheless, it would be reasonable to try to merge your changes after > Alexandre is done, so that we are sure that no detail has been lost. If > you feel comfortable with CVS merge facilities I would encourage you to > merge yourself (send me your SF userid for CVS access). This however may > be tedious, so if you do not volunteer to do this part, I can do it. I'd be happy to do the merge. My SF ID is "rotofoil". >> I have verified that OpenC++ is still compilable with Gcc 2.95, but >> I have not tested it with any other compiler. > > Why don't you join the project? There is quite reasonable testing > environment on Source Forge Compile Farm. I do not have any experience with SF's compile farm and could use some help in testing. Unfortunately, I do not have the time to manually configure and test OpenC++ on each and every architecture and compiler. Is there an automated way to try a compilation on all architectures? Which architectures need to be considered as ``supported by OpenC++''? Kind regards, Michael -- ho...@sa..., ho...@in... http://www.sax.de/~hohmuth/ |