From: David W. <dwh...@id...> - 2002-05-06 14:30:22
|
I think it's best to start simple, then add things later. Start with the 2-5 things that people really want, then add the other things later. I believe the "short list" is Open Office and Mozilla... so let's get those on. I think it's appropriate to start by using each of their installers; if they're too hard to use, then work to either (1) make theirs better or (2) create a generic installer, and then try to convince the other projects to use it. Otherwise, you'll have a lot of work interfering with each other. Flavors are a _great_ idea, but since there isn't even _one_ CD yet, I think it's time to create one CD now and add the others later. I think it _is_ important to agree that other Flavors will come; that way, people won't be worried that gcc or the source code aren't on the initial CD... instead, they'll know that it'll go on a yet-to-be-released CD. When those other CDs are added, they need to have simple names, preferably telling you what's on them. E.G. "Software Development", "Games", "Servers", "Education", "Desktop" (or "Office Desktop"). A "source code" CD makes sense, too, to support those who don't have good bandwidth. Ideally the infrastructure should be more media-independent, but CDs are the most universal format right now. Older machines won't have DVD readers, and we want users with older machines to be able to use this. --- David A. Wheeler |