From: J A. F. <jaa...@ya...> - 2002-05-03 23:11:06
|
--- James Shuttleworth <ja...@di...> wrote: > And for my last effort to kill mouses (mice?), how about links as a > browser? I like it. I don't use it all the time, but if I know I want > just the information and none of the crud, it's amazing. > > That's my contribution. I understand that people new to open source / free > / powerful software might get a little scared, but maybe we could have an > "advanced" menu (or page if you go with the HTML thing)? If people don't > use it, fine. I do think, though, that many people will think "I'm > advanced" or at least "Wow, if I've been paying for software that is less > powerful than this stuff and it's not even in the advanced section, haven't > I been well and truly shafted?". Or something. > > James Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think links is only ported to cygwin, not native win32. I love links, use it all the time, but I dont' think it should go on the initial CD we're putting together. A good email client though, now that's important. A note about "advanced" software: Look, the first thing that goes on any windows machine I use is cygwin. Followed by xemacs, gvim, and mozilla. I don't know how I ever worked on windows before them. However, including "advanced" software like xemacs, gvim, cygwin, compilers, and any command line related utilities like pine or links I feel would be deterimental to the CD. Remember, we're attempting to offer the best in open source software for the *average* windows user. The average windows user thinks that hiding the command prompt back under Start->Programs->Accessories is an improvement. Including advanced software could very well backfire, leaving windows users even more convinced that open source software is just for geeks. The OpenCD should showcase a few well written, extemely user friendly applications. I should be able to give this CD to my mother and just let her run with it. At least, that's my thoughts on the main CD we should be working to produce here. There has been talk about producing several CDs with each CD targetting a slightly different type of user or containing a different mix of application types. I really hope we can eventually do something like that, but our initial focus should be on producing a very user friendly introduction to the open source world. In fact, with so many people suggesting so many good OS applications for windows, I was thinking that perhaps someone eventually needs to put together a "distribution" of OS software for windows. That's not what this project is aiming at right now and maybe this could eventually be incorporated into the OpenCD project or maybe it should be a project all on its own. Maybe something based on cygwin and includes just about every open source app of decent quality out there, and would have a unified installer that loaded it all very nicely onto your hard drive. Yeah all this software is out there (most of it is included with cygwin), but then all the parts of RedHat are out there too and I'm not interested in going out and collecting them all each time I want to install linux. Anyways, I'm sorry about the long rant and perhaps I misunderstand the goal of this project, but I feel to be successful, right now we should focus on just a few top quality applications and maybe sometime down the road we'll be able to put together and "advanced" CD. If anyone else has any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear them. jaaron __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com |