From: J A. F. <jaa...@ya...> - 2002-05-03 14:43:28
|
--- Henrik Nilsen Omma <h....@bt...> wrote: > On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 08:57, Toby Inkster wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2002 21:14:14 -0700 (PDT) > > J Aaron Farr <jaa...@ya...> wrote: > > > > JAF> Perhaps I should clarify by what I mean as an HTML based installer. > > JAF> There's a difference between and HTML based installer and and > > JAF> HTTP based installer.... > > > > I still don't think this is a great idea: > > > > 1) it would look less professional than a proper purpose-built > application; and > > 2) people are wary about installing things off the Internet -- yes, > > *I* realise they would be installing things of the CD, not the > > Internet... but would they? > > > > What if we modify K-meleon in such a way that it's not possible for the > novice to see that it's a browser. It can be run in a permanent full > screen mode, and we can put in all our own buttons for navigation. In > that case we should probably not link to any site on the net, but we can > still preserve the same look and feel of the web site. In that way, > when the user does go on-line later the enviornment will be familiar. > > This can be made to look quite professional with some good web design > (and I think we have people signed up that are good at this); certainly > much better than your average windows installer, with its ugly green > background and grey prompting windows. > > - Henrik I really like this idea of K-Meleon. It would take a little work, but I think it would be really nice. And as mentioned, with proper HTML design, the installer would look just as proffesional as any standalone. jaaron __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com |