From: Imran G. <im...@bi...> - 2002-05-02 23:36:15
|
On 2 May 2002, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote: > On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 18:30, Alex Roston wrote: > > J Aaron Farr wrote: > > > > > On the other hand, many of the applications under consideration have excellent > > > installers already developed. Do we really want to throw these out and start > > > from scratch? Mozilla and OpenOffice have very nice installers for example. > > > Should our installer then simply call these installers, or should we have one > > > unified installer? > > > > Call the already written installers. Anything else is too much work, and > > also assumes that we know more about the application and how it should > > be installed than the people who wrote it. > > Totally agreed. Can anyone do a simple proof-of-concept HTML installer? > It only needs to say hello, and let the user click on an image to launch > an installer. Then I can put this as a zip file on org.site for > everyone to download and test. If it works with all browsers and all > settings, then that might be the way to go. I would certainly be the > easiest. It should be doable as some UK magazines(notably PC Plus) used to have HTML installer pages like we're proposing. Imran -- http://bits.bris.ac.uk |