Re: [Openbsdbinpatch-misc] Patch for /var/db/binpatch stuff

[Mike E. <mi...@er...>]

Gerardo Santana G=F3mez Garrido wrote:
> I see your point.
>=20
> Our difference arises probably from my belief that /var/db/binpatch is
> a convenience too.
>=20
> But even if I were the first patchtools enthusiast and supporter, I'd
> look back to the ports subsystem. I don't see a target in bsd.port.mk
> that handles /var/db/pkg directly; it's the pkgtools that handle
> /var/db/pkg.

Even before "make install" ran pkg_add in ports, /var/db/pkg was created =
using=20
bsd.port.mk.

I guess it doesn't matter.  If it's not imported into CVS for bsd.binpatc=
h.mk,=20
I'll just patch my local copy.

-ME