Re: [Openbsdbinpatch-misc] Patch for /var/db/binpatch stuff

[Mike E. <mi...@er...>]

Mike Erdely wrote:
> Gerardo Santana G=F3mez Garrido wrote:
>> If we make a difference between a build server (binpatch framework)
>> and patch tools (patch_*) I think the later should handle
>> /var/db/binpatch.
>=20
> Unless you want to keep it simple and have the binpatch "tools" be opti=
onal.  If=20
> you have all of the components in the tarball, it doesn't matter whethe=
r you use=20
> patch_add or tar, the result should be the same.

No comments about this?  I think the goal should be to keep binpatch simp=
le.  As=20
an example, if someone were to write a front-end to PF, you'd still want =
to be=20
able to "vi /etc/pf.conf" and have the same functionality, right?

-ME