From: Denis L. <de...@po...> - 2008-10-31 09:17:25
|
Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > So it seems to imply that what controls the license version and that other > versions are allowed is the copyright header in each source file; I checked and > all sources seem to say "no later version", so unless I'm misinterpreting the > LGPL text, I don't think there's an issue. Marcelo, yes that makes sense, and the source code therefore is LGPL 2.1 (no later version). Thanks for the clarification. -denis |