Re: [OSR-users] What other cdsl's to configure?

[Marc G. <gr...@at...>]

Hi Dan,
On Friday 29 May 2009 17:57:32 Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Hi Marc --
>
> Thanks for your reply on the cdsl's.
>
> I'm about to start another round of setting up an
> OSR for Xen/EL5/ocfs2.  I have my current one
> working and booting 8 virtual nodes.  However
> I made enough tweaks along the way that I want
> to ensure I can reproduce it.
>
> Last time, I used the following rpm versions:
>
> comoonics-bootimage-1.4-21.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-bootimage-extras-ocfs2-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-bootimage-initscripts-1.4-9.rhel5.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-bootimage-listfiles-1.3-8.el5.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-bootimage-listfiles-all-0.1-5.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-bootimage-listfiles-rhel-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-bootimage-listfiles-rhel5-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-12.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-17.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-cs-py-0.1-56.noarch.rpm
> comoonics-pythonosfix-py-0.1-2.noarch.rpm
> SysVinit-comoonics-2.86-14.atix.1.i386.rpm
>
> Are there any newer versions of these?  (And is
> there any changelog list or other mechanism I
> can use generally to check for newer versions?
> I want to download rpm's, not use yum or up2date.)
First no the version with the el5 detection patches is not yet rpm build. But 
it will be in the next version. I think I will release those fixes within the 
next week when we finished our first Q&A round on the beta channel.

About changelogs. There are always the rpm changelogs. Every new major version 
will get release notes (automatically). This is new so I don't know if we 
will have it fully in 4.5 which is right now on Q&A.

>
> The version above still has the problem with the
> /etc/redhat-release not parsing the Oracle version
> string.  Is this fixed somewhere?  I'm currently
> just patching it manually.  Also, I'm wondering if
> you might have taken my suggestion of using
> "modprobe -q" so that ugly FATAL messages aren't
> printed for modules that might already be built
> into the kernel.  (Specifically, xennet and xenblk)
Ok. I'll keep it in mind. I didn't have it completly registered in my 
mind ;-) . But now it is. I have to think about it but I don't think it's a 
bad idea. I'll keep you up2date on this.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan

Regards


-- 
Gruss / Regards,

Marc Grimme
http://www.atix.de/               http://www.open-sharedroot.org/