You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(11) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(7) |
2017 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
From: Ryan W. <rb...@gm...> - 2020-11-17 21:27:10
|
Nice. Would like to hear about anyone’s experiences on this front. Ryan Bailey Williams > On Nov 17, 2020, at 11:37, Russell, Bryan A via Open-rtms-list <ope...@li...> wrote: > > > Seems to work, but I guess activity is low? > > I joined the list less than a month ago and this is my first email. > > What I will personally do is send an update with my data when I start to test my first sucessful build, including any information that could help others! > > Cheers, > > Bryan > From: Eagle Sight <eag...@gm...> > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 12:26 AM > To: Ope...@li... <Ope...@li...> > Subject: [Open-rtms-list] My first email > > Hi > > I am planning to build a rTMS to use it at home. I found this mailing list. I wonder if it us active. > > Dash > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list |
From: Russell, B. A <bry...@my...> - 2020-11-17 17:37:32
|
Seems to work, but I guess activity is low? I joined the list less than a month ago and this is my first email. What I will personally do is send an update with my data when I start to test my first sucessful build, including any information that could help others! Cheers, Bryan ________________________________ From: Eagle Sight <eag...@gm...> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 12:26 AM To: Ope...@li... <Ope...@li...> Subject: [Open-rtms-list] My first email Hi I am planning to build a rTMS to use it at home. I found this mailing list. I wonder if it us active. Dash |
From: Daniel C. <dan...@gm...> - 2020-11-17 06:32:03
|
Unfortunately not. There's been about 19 emails since 2013. On Mon, Nov 16, 2020, 23:26 Eagle Sight <eag...@gm...> wrote: > Hi > > I am planning to build a rTMS to use it at home. I found this mailing > list. I wonder if it us active. > > Dash > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > |
From: Eagle S. <eag...@gm...> - 2020-11-17 06:26:31
|
Hi I am planning to build a rTMS to use it at home. I found this mailing list. I wonder if it us active. Dash |
From: Isaac <owl...@gm...> - 2019-12-16 00:48:01
|
Hey friends, I just stumbled across this site after watching the Hellion series by Greg & Dana Newkirk. They used a device called the "god helmet" which I had to pause the video just to look up bc I was immediately interested, haha. I've been a self proclaimed psychonaut for only 2 years (cannabis & DXM are my only real experiences) and have been VERY interested in tinkering with some kind of device to explore my own consciousness. I'm not an engineer but I have successfully built my own desktop PC. I also purchased a raspberry pi zero kit so I could learn how to build one and was curious if maybe I could incorporate that into my diy EEG project? I have the list of parts to purchase but I don't want to go all-in until I get a feel from other folks. I'm a fast learner so it should be no problem once I get started. Any ideas? I would greatly appreciate the advice =) -Isaac |
From: luke d. <luk...@gm...> - 2019-03-12 23:26:33
|
I was surprised to see anyone posting, actually. I had looked at making a small circuit board to do this, but never got much further. Anyone still interested? On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:09 AM < ope...@li...> wrote: > Send Open-rtms-list mailing list submissions to > ope...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ope...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ope...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Open-rtms-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Is this Project DEAD? (Mateusz Nowak) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:20:52 +0100 > From: Mateusz Nowak <mat...@gm...> > To: Ope...@li... > Subject: [Open-rtms-list] Is this Project DEAD? > Message-ID: <5c8...@gm...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I've been reading some stuff on popular science website from Poland > about 10years ago but this front page project looks like 10 years ago. > > Greetings for Every Soul reading this. You are beautiful human being! > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Open-rtms-list Digest, Vol 27, Issue 1 > ********************************************* > |
From: Mateusz N. <mat...@gm...> - 2019-03-11 23:20:59
|
I've been reading some stuff on popular science website from Poland about 10years ago but this front page project looks like 10 years ago. Greetings for Every Soul reading this. You are beautiful human being! |
From: Francisco B. <fra...@gm...> - 2019-01-16 14:43:25
|
I would like to know if you sell a machine that provoke alterations of consciousness though a field of electromagnetic waves. Thanks |
From: Zaxonautoparts.com <in...@se...> - 2017-04-13 23:47:52
|
Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://send.zaxonautoparts.com/display.php?M=45745&C=c11f16c68a24b903968dcd53c6c5603b&S=4&L=3&N=3 To stop receiving these emails:http://send.zaxonautoparts.com/unsubscribe.php?M=45745&C=c11f16c68a24b903968dcd53c6c5603b&L=3&N=4 |
From: superkuh <sup...@su...> - 2017-01-18 18:01:22
|
Joley Brown, rTMS is a real thing with a real mechanism of action and actual scientific uses. Even if the open rtms list is mostly dead and thus now unmoderated this is not the appropriate place for your pseudo-science conspiracy drivel. Please go away. From: Joley Brown <bro...@co...> Subject: [Open-rtms-list] Rather like a cranial radio? > I know from personal experience that in autistic people there's a > sensitivity to persons or devices nearby. |
From: <no...@ti...> - 2017-01-17 17:30:51
|
Unsubscribe On January 17, 2017 4:26:38 AM EST, Joley Brown <bro...@co...> wrote: > I know from personal experience that in autistic people there's a >sensitivity to persons or devices nearby. It's a pain in the brain >sometimes because there's only like zero serious research, unless >government types from a rich nation is using it. The "Men who stare at >goats" comes to mind. Projection would always take more energy than >perception, which is just reception spelt sideways. Sort of. > >LSD was reported to have been used in US Army tests for that ummm... >capacity. Since the whole project of God-Helmet was investigating >psychic or metaphysical purposes... I dropped acid less than 10 times, >about 30-ish years ago and at small doses compared to the Army studies. > >Like, 5 mikes instead of a couple hundred. They kind of went overboard >on that. Now there's digital drugs, binaural beats, that purport to be >a >recreation of doing a lot of dope. And using the neural connections for >benign purposes would start it off morally correct. That should make >for >a much better set of results. > >Would you perhaps be thinking on the order of using the binaural >patterns on a perhaps higher than commercial FM? > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >_______________________________________________ >Open-rtms-list mailing list >Ope...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
From: Joley B. <bro...@co...> - 2017-01-17 16:26:32
|
I know from personal experience that in autistic people there's a sensitivity to persons or devices nearby. It's a pain in the brain sometimes because there's only like zero serious research, unless government types from a rich nation is using it. The "Men who stare at goats" comes to mind. Projection would always take more energy than perception, which is just reception spelt sideways. Sort of. LSD was reported to have been used in US Army tests for that ummm... capacity. Since the whole project of God-Helmet was investigating psychic or metaphysical purposes... I dropped acid less than 10 times, about 30-ish years ago and at small doses compared to the Army studies. Like, 5 mikes instead of a couple hundred. They kind of went overboard on that. Now there's digital drugs, binaural beats, that purport to be a recreation of doing a lot of dope. And using the neural connections for benign purposes would start it off morally correct. That should make for a much better set of results. Would you perhaps be thinking on the order of using the binaural patterns on a perhaps higher than commercial FM? |
From: Axel H. <no...@ti...> - 2017-01-16 17:38:47
|
Unsubscribe On 1/16/17 11:16 AM, Rubén MD wrote: > > Hi Everybody, > > > I have the theory that there is an element that could works as tms > (and with the difference to tdcs that lately has been discused about > if the electrity doesn´t cross the skin of the scalp). > > > This element is the famous Tesla coil or its comercial version of the > 80s plasma ball that as you can see in the pics it transmit the energy > in the wireless way, so maybe it could cross the scalp like the > magnetic fields. > > > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/L3cZXfgnF8A/hqdefault.jpg > > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DGk3O-zg2E8/hqdefault.jpg > > Do you think that it could works? > > > pd: Sorry for talk about a different thing to the standard TMS > > > Best regards > > > Rubén > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list |
From: Rubén MD <sk...@ho...> - 2017-01-16 16:16:10
|
Hi Everybody, I have the theory that there is an element that could works as tms (and with the difference to tdcs that lately has been discused about if the electrity doesn´t cross the skin of the scalp). This element is the famous Tesla coil or its comercial version of the 80s plasma ball that as you can see in the pics it transmit the energy in the wireless way, so maybe it could cross the scalp like the magnetic fields. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/L3cZXfgnF8A/hqdefault.jpg https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DGk3O-zg2E8/hqdefault.jpg [https://i.ytimg.com/vi/L3cZXfgnF8A/hqdefault.jpg] [https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DGk3O-zg2E8/hqdefault.jpg] Do you think that it could works? pd: Sorry for talk about a different thing to the standard TMS Best regards Rubén ________________________________ |
From: Joley B. <bro...@co...> - 2017-01-16 15:47:04
|
It would make for a more thorough monitoring layer, not primary. or at least that's what I'm taking away. No such thing as too much data harvesting. I recall clearly when eeg's were hooked to 8088 processors. it's a revolution, having things like synchronized processors each with about a million times the processing speed as the early research machines and tools. Viva la revolucion. This one question got more responses than the last 5 years. That's coolness, on the hoof. |
From: <no...@ti...> - 2017-01-15 14:55:02
|
Unsubscribe On January 15, 2017 9:02:43 AM EST, "Abe S." <or...@gm...> wrote: >I think the infrared sensors that they use for measuring bran activity >actually measure changes in blood flow, which, as you say, ends up >covering >a larger area. The change in blood flow is also much slower than the >electrical potentials, so you can see broad regions becoming more or >less >active (more activity -> more oxygen and glucose required -> more blood >flow) but you can't look for things like alpha waves. > >-Abe > > >On Jan 15, 2017 8:47 AM, "Alexander Liebendorfer" ><ale...@gm...> >wrote: > >Actually, infrared can penetrate the scalp ( >http://authors.library.caltech.edu/58056/1/Yue_2015p93210S.pdf for an >example measurement), it just apparently gets very nonlocal due to >scattering and hence an array is much better than a targeted source >for illumination. > >However, measuring neural activity through infrared light sounds >rather unfeasible, alone because of the scattering and distortion >through blood heat flow. >I'm not sure I quite understand why you think that a sensor >electromagnet would have an intensity, so far most EEGs I've heard of >have passive sensors that then amplify tiny signals given by the brain >in a circuit elsewhere; do people put a field on the sensors and if >so, why? >I don't think there is really any risk in using EEG sensors, or >couldn't think of one. > >On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Aidan Hoolachan <aj...@bu...> >wrote: >> No, infrared sensors / heat are a very different mechanism than >magnetic >> coils and electromagnetic induction. Infrared does not penetrate the >scalp >> like the magnetic fields are able to. >> >> On Jan 15, 2017 5:10 AM, "Joley Brown" <bro...@co...> >wrote: >>> >>> The magnetic coils is a really inexpensive model for the eeg output, >>> but would infrared perhaps give the same or perhaps more wide spread >>> Signal Out? It seems the coils give a narrower set of responses. I'm >>> probably a bit off the path on that. But IR sensors measure heat >with >>> say, 1/100th of a degree F. What I would have to fill in with that >>> equation, how much heat would be generated, and how quickly, by any >>> small neural clusters? The reason I could most easily justify is >that >>> the higher intensity from the sensor electromagnet might be >hazardous. >>> It's one of the cautions of doing these measurements. An IR sensor >would >>> be a lot more passive,yes? and calibrated to watch a wider scan of >those >>> clusters, more of them. To a processor the output of light vs a more >>> intensive part of the electro-magnetic spectrum would be a set of >>> numbers. Like representing a melody in F minor being played in a >higher >>> key. It's 0300 local time and I should get some sleep before looking >at >>> this again. >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >------------------ >>> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >>> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >>> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >>> Training and support from Colfax. >>> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Open-rtms-list mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >------------------ >> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >> Training and support from Colfax. >> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >> _______________________________________________ >> Open-rtms-list mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list >> > >------------------------------------------------------------ >------------------ >Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >Training and support from Colfax. >Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >_______________________________________________ >Open-rtms-list mailing list >Ope...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
From: <no...@ti...> - 2017-01-15 14:54:58
|
Unsubscribe On January 15, 2017 8:45:59 AM EST, Alexander Liebendorfer <ale...@gm...> wrote: >Actually, infrared can penetrate the scalp ( >http://authors.library.caltech.edu/58056/1/Yue_2015p93210S.pdf for an >example measurement), it just apparently gets very nonlocal due to >scattering and hence an array is much better than a targeted source >for illumination. > >However, measuring neural activity through infrared light sounds >rather unfeasible, alone because of the scattering and distortion >through blood heat flow. >I'm not sure I quite understand why you think that a sensor >electromagnet would have an intensity, so far most EEGs I've heard of >have passive sensors that then amplify tiny signals given by the brain >in a circuit elsewhere; do people put a field on the sensors and if >so, why? >I don't think there is really any risk in using EEG sensors, or >couldn't think of one. > >On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Aidan Hoolachan <aj...@bu...> >wrote: >> No, infrared sensors / heat are a very different mechanism than >magnetic >> coils and electromagnetic induction. Infrared does not penetrate the >scalp >> like the magnetic fields are able to. >> >> On Jan 15, 2017 5:10 AM, "Joley Brown" <bro...@co...> >wrote: >>> >>> The magnetic coils is a really inexpensive model for the eeg output, >>> but would infrared perhaps give the same or perhaps more wide spread >>> Signal Out? It seems the coils give a narrower set of responses. I'm >>> probably a bit off the path on that. But IR sensors measure heat >with >>> say, 1/100th of a degree F. What I would have to fill in with that >>> equation, how much heat would be generated, and how quickly, by any >>> small neural clusters? The reason I could most easily justify is >that >>> the higher intensity from the sensor electromagnet might be >hazardous. >>> It's one of the cautions of doing these measurements. An IR sensor >would >>> be a lot more passive,yes? and calibrated to watch a wider scan of >those >>> clusters, more of them. To a processor the output of light vs a more >>> intensive part of the electro-magnetic spectrum would be a set of >>> numbers. Like representing a melody in F minor being played in a >higher >>> key. It's 0300 local time and I should get some sleep before looking >at >>> this again. >>> >>> >>> >>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >>> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >>> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >>> Training and support from Colfax. >>> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Open-rtms-list mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list >> >> >> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >> Training and support from Colfax. >> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >> _______________________________________________ >> Open-rtms-list mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list >> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >Training and support from Colfax. >Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >_______________________________________________ >Open-rtms-list mailing list >Ope...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
From: Abe S. <or...@gm...> - 2017-01-15 14:02:53
|
I think the infrared sensors that they use for measuring bran activity actually measure changes in blood flow, which, as you say, ends up covering a larger area. The change in blood flow is also much slower than the electrical potentials, so you can see broad regions becoming more or less active (more activity -> more oxygen and glucose required -> more blood flow) but you can't look for things like alpha waves. -Abe On Jan 15, 2017 8:47 AM, "Alexander Liebendorfer" <ale...@gm...> wrote: Actually, infrared can penetrate the scalp ( http://authors.library.caltech.edu/58056/1/Yue_2015p93210S.pdf for an example measurement), it just apparently gets very nonlocal due to scattering and hence an array is much better than a targeted source for illumination. However, measuring neural activity through infrared light sounds rather unfeasible, alone because of the scattering and distortion through blood heat flow. I'm not sure I quite understand why you think that a sensor electromagnet would have an intensity, so far most EEGs I've heard of have passive sensors that then amplify tiny signals given by the brain in a circuit elsewhere; do people put a field on the sensors and if so, why? I don't think there is really any risk in using EEG sensors, or couldn't think of one. On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Aidan Hoolachan <aj...@bu...> wrote: > No, infrared sensors / heat are a very different mechanism than magnetic > coils and electromagnetic induction. Infrared does not penetrate the scalp > like the magnetic fields are able to. > > On Jan 15, 2017 5:10 AM, "Joley Brown" <bro...@co...> wrote: >> >> The magnetic coils is a really inexpensive model for the eeg output, >> but would infrared perhaps give the same or perhaps more wide spread >> Signal Out? It seems the coils give a narrower set of responses. I'm >> probably a bit off the path on that. But IR sensors measure heat with >> say, 1/100th of a degree F. What I would have to fill in with that >> equation, how much heat would be generated, and how quickly, by any >> small neural clusters? The reason I could most easily justify is that >> the higher intensity from the sensor electromagnet might be hazardous. >> It's one of the cautions of doing these measurements. An IR sensor would >> be a lot more passive,yes? and calibrated to watch a wider scan of those >> clusters, more of them. To a processor the output of light vs a more >> intensive part of the electro-magnetic spectrum would be a set of >> numbers. Like representing a melody in F minor being played in a higher >> key. It's 0300 local time and I should get some sleep before looking at >> this again. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ >> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >> Training and support from Colfax. >> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >> _______________________________________________ >> Open-rtms-list mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Open-rtms-list mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list |
From: Alexander L. <ale...@gm...> - 2017-01-15 13:46:07
|
Actually, infrared can penetrate the scalp ( http://authors.library.caltech.edu/58056/1/Yue_2015p93210S.pdf for an example measurement), it just apparently gets very nonlocal due to scattering and hence an array is much better than a targeted source for illumination. However, measuring neural activity through infrared light sounds rather unfeasible, alone because of the scattering and distortion through blood heat flow. I'm not sure I quite understand why you think that a sensor electromagnet would have an intensity, so far most EEGs I've heard of have passive sensors that then amplify tiny signals given by the brain in a circuit elsewhere; do people put a field on the sensors and if so, why? I don't think there is really any risk in using EEG sensors, or couldn't think of one. On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Aidan Hoolachan <aj...@bu...> wrote: > No, infrared sensors / heat are a very different mechanism than magnetic > coils and electromagnetic induction. Infrared does not penetrate the scalp > like the magnetic fields are able to. > > On Jan 15, 2017 5:10 AM, "Joley Brown" <bro...@co...> wrote: >> >> The magnetic coils is a really inexpensive model for the eeg output, >> but would infrared perhaps give the same or perhaps more wide spread >> Signal Out? It seems the coils give a narrower set of responses. I'm >> probably a bit off the path on that. But IR sensors measure heat with >> say, 1/100th of a degree F. What I would have to fill in with that >> equation, how much heat would be generated, and how quickly, by any >> small neural clusters? The reason I could most easily justify is that >> the higher intensity from the sensor electromagnet might be hazardous. >> It's one of the cautions of doing these measurements. An IR sensor would >> be a lot more passive,yes? and calibrated to watch a wider scan of those >> clusters, more of them. To a processor the output of light vs a more >> intensive part of the electro-magnetic spectrum would be a set of >> numbers. Like representing a melody in F minor being played in a higher >> key. It's 0300 local time and I should get some sleep before looking at >> this again. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >> Training and support from Colfax. >> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi >> _______________________________________________ >> Open-rtms-list mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > |
From: Aidan H. <aj...@bu...> - 2017-01-15 10:45:32
|
No, infrared sensors / heat are a very different mechanism than magnetic coils and electromagnetic induction. Infrared does not penetrate the scalp like the magnetic fields are able to. On Jan 15, 2017 5:10 AM, "Joley Brown" <bro...@co...> wrote: > The magnetic coils is a really inexpensive model for the eeg output, > but would infrared perhaps give the same or perhaps more wide spread > Signal Out? It seems the coils give a narrower set of responses. I'm > probably a bit off the path on that. But IR sensors measure heat with > say, 1/100th of a degree F. What I would have to fill in with that > equation, how much heat would be generated, and how quickly, by any > small neural clusters? The reason I could most easily justify is that > the higher intensity from the sensor electromagnet might be hazardous. > It's one of the cautions of doing these measurements. An IR sensor would > be a lot more passive,yes? and calibrated to watch a wider scan of those > clusters, more of them. To a processor the output of light vs a more > intensive part of the electro-magnetic spectrum would be a set of > numbers. Like representing a melody in F minor being played in a higher > key. It's 0300 local time and I should get some sleep before looking at > this again. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > |
From: Joley B. <bro...@co...> - 2017-01-15 10:10:38
|
The magnetic coils is a really inexpensive model for the eeg output, but would infrared perhaps give the same or perhaps more wide spread Signal Out? It seems the coils give a narrower set of responses. I'm probably a bit off the path on that. But IR sensors measure heat with say, 1/100th of a degree F. What I would have to fill in with that equation, how much heat would be generated, and how quickly, by any small neural clusters? The reason I could most easily justify is that the higher intensity from the sensor electromagnet might be hazardous. It's one of the cautions of doing these measurements. An IR sensor would be a lot more passive,yes? and calibrated to watch a wider scan of those clusters, more of them. To a processor the output of light vs a more intensive part of the electro-magnetic spectrum would be a set of numbers. Like representing a melody in F minor being played in a higher key. It's 0300 local time and I should get some sleep before looking at this again. |
From: Anxt Mn T. Ur Sa-a. Q. <ela...@gm...> - 2017-01-13 18:18:49
|
Great Day to everyone, I have been researching rTMS and I am embarking on a journey creation. I was curious as to any updates, evolutions, revelations, or any tips and tricks that have been acquired by those before me. I am choosing to do things a tad bit differently, personally building an Intel SBC on a "Nano" scale, and I was wondering would it be logical to bypass the MCU or should I include the Propeller SMD? Has anyone tried direct coiling? using varied and combined coils (metal types) and has anyone reversed the I/O for transcranial reading? |
From: superkuh <sup...@su...> - 2016-12-18 08:44:12
|
A static magnetic field does absolutely nothing. The mechanism of action by which TMS works is the rapidly changing magnetic field. Only the rate in change of the magnetic field matters. The rate in change is proportional to the induced voltage. It's a simple application of high school physics in the form of faraday's law. With regard to the electromagnets you linked, those won't work either because their inductance is far too high to get a high rate in change in current. Without a high rate in change of current you can't get a high rate in change in the magnetic field and no voltage will be induced. The form and construction of TMS machines, and particularly rTMS machines exists for a reason. They use stimulator coils with relatively low inductance, perhaps only 10-20 microhenries. And even with such low inductance very high voltages in the pulse power system are still required so that the current in the coil has a high rate of change. You simply cannot get around this without abandoning the mechanism by which TMS works. Sorry, but your suggest will not work and cannot work. - superkuh On 12/17/2016 06:03 AM, ope...@li... wrote: > Send Open-rtms-list mailing list submissions to > ope...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ope...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ope...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Open-rtms-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Post list (Rub?n MD) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:07:50 +0000 > From: Rub?n MD <sk...@ho...> > Subject: [Open-rtms-list] Post list > To: "ope...@li..." > <ope...@li...> > Message-ID: > <HE1PR03MB1755BB80250D68688A68E677B99C0@HE1PR03MB1755.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > Hi, > > I am a new user and I would like to post in the forum/list. My message is: > > Hi everyone, > > I am not an expert in electronic or neurology, but as all of you I am really interested in making and TMS (to treat depression in my case). > > Sometime ago I tried with neodymium magnets that have the suck power of 25 kg and 80 kg but I didn't have success whit them (I usually tried to move them in the area in the head tipically used with TMS). > > Now I have another simple idea and I would like to share with all of you, I know that is so simple but I think its interesant and is: > > Why don't use a solenoid that creates a magnetic field (maybe similar than TMS devices)? That is an electromagnet available in different sizes to get different strenghts. Logically to be more similar to a rTMS it would have to create the magnetic fields for only microseconds and repeat it for much times. > > For example in aliexpress.com<http://aliexpress.com> there are a lot very cheaps with strenght of 10 kg, 25 kg, 40 kg, 80 kg... > > I think the most interesant model would create a strenght of around 1 Tesla, what would be, about 10 kg? > > What do you think? At least I would like to know your opinions about why to discard this option. > > I hope to give you an interesant point. > > Thanks everybody and sorry for my english. > > Rub?n > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Open-rtms-list mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-rtms-list > > > End of Open-rtms-list Digest, Vol 21, Issue 4 > ********************************************* |
From: Rubén MD <sk...@ho...> - 2016-12-16 19:08:09
|
Hi, I am a new user and I would like to post in the forum/list. My message is: Hi everyone, I am not an expert in electronic or neurology, but as all of you I am really interested in making and TMS (to treat depression in my case). Sometime ago I tried with neodymium magnets that have the suck power of 25 kg and 80 kg but I didn't have success whit them (I usually tried to move them in the area in the head tipically used with TMS). Now I have another simple idea and I would like to share with all of you, I know that is so simple but I think its interesant and is: Why don't use a solenoid that creates a magnetic field (maybe similar than TMS devices)? That is an electromagnet available in different sizes to get different strenghts. Logically to be more similar to a rTMS it would have to create the magnetic fields for only microseconds and repeat it for much times. For example in aliexpress.com<http://aliexpress.com> there are a lot very cheaps with strenght of 10 kg, 25 kg, 40 kg, 80 kg... I think the most interesant model would create a strenght of around 1 Tesla, what would be, about 10 kg? What do you think? At least I would like to know your opinions about why to discard this option. I hope to give you an interesant point. Thanks everybody and sorry for my english. Rubén |
From: Danny C. <dan...@gm...> - 2016-10-07 09:07:13
|
Where is the forum located? On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Joley Brown <bro...@co...> wrote: > Anyway, at least one correspondent asked about a zip file of the forum. |