It's my opinion, though not being in any offical capacity, that one
should never break existing behaviour. Therefore loosening the meaning
of PRIVATE doesn't seem right to me. I would suggest an additional
keyword on the PRIVATE declaration, instead of having to invent a new
keyword, something like PRIVATE EXTENDED or something like that. Would
that be feasible for Rick's already existing updates?
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.