From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-05-22 14:54:35
|
Bugs item #2795426, was opened at 2009-05-22 16:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by orexx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2795426&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: APIs Group: v4.0beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: ArrayPut accepts idx value of 0 Initial Comment: The interface function ArrayPut(arr, obj, idx) expects an "idx" value that is 1-based. By mistake I used the value 0 and it got accepted. Later, an ArrayItems() would abend the program (unfortunately in an JNI controlled environment, not allowing to step-in with the debugger after the fact, causing quite some time to corner this), and an ArraySize() would surprisingly return an "incredible" high number (2130751760), which brought me on the right trail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2795426&group_id=119701 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-05-22 15:15:50
|
Bugs item #2795426, was opened at 2009-05-22 10:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bigrixx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2795426&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: APIs Group: v4.0beta >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) >Assigned to: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Summary: ArrayPut accepts idx value of 0 Initial Comment: The interface function ArrayPut(arr, obj, idx) expects an "idx" value that is 1-based. By mistake I used the value 0 and it got accepted. Later, an ArrayItems() would abend the program (unfortunately in an JNI controlled environment, not allowing to step-in with the debugger after the fact, causing quite some time to corner this), and an ArraySize() would surprisingly return an "incredible" high number (2130751760), which brought me on the right trail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2009-05-22 11:15 Message: Committed revision 4723. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2795426&group_id=119701 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-02-19 22:10:33
|
Bugs item #2795426, was opened at 2009-05-22 07:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by miesfeld You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2795426&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: APIs >Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Assigned to: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Summary: ArrayPut accepts idx value of 0 Initial Comment: The interface function ArrayPut(arr, obj, idx) expects an "idx" value that is 1-based. By mistake I used the value 0 and it got accepted. Later, an ArrayItems() would abend the program (unfortunately in an JNI controlled environment, not allowing to step-in with the debugger after the fact, causing quite some time to corner this), and an ArraySize() would surprisingly return an "incredible" high number (2130751760), which brought me on the right trail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld) Date: 2010-02-19 14:10 Message: The fix for this item was in the 4.0.0 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2009-05-22 08:15 Message: Committed revision 4723. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2795426&group_id=119701 |