Menu
▾
▴
[Oorexx-bugs] [ oorexx-Bugs-1609955 ] DLGAREA examples within Init
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-12-16 11:29:44
|
Bugs item #1609955, was opened at 2006-12-06 09:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sahananda You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=1609955&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: v3.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Gert van der Kooij (gkooij) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DLGAREA examples within Init Initial Comment: Hi, The examples within chapter 10.10.1 showing the DlgArea class all are using the 'new' method while the 'init' method is described. It's a bit confusing now if you don't know that the init method is always executed when a new instance is created. In my opinion the 10.10.1 init method should be renamed to 'new' to prevent confusion. Kind regards, Gert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jon Wolfers (sahananda) Date: 2006-12-16 11:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=667060 Originator: NO Gert said: If you agree I will delete this bug report. I agree. It's not ideal, but at least it is consistent & I do apreciate the thoroughness of the ooRexx documentation. kind regards, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gert van der Kooij (gkooij) Date: 2006-12-16 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=685845 Originator: YES Hi Jon, In the other classes the init method is described in the same way you described it for the dlgarea class so I don't think we should change them. If you agree I will delete this bug report. Regards, Gert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jon Wolfers (sahananda) Date: 2006-12-15 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=667060 Originator: NO I wrote that. I was in a quandry how to present it. I don't mind either way. I guess if it was changed to 'New' it should be suffixed with '(Class Method)' and the syntax diagram should be amended likewise. There is an example right below the list of arguments that shows using the 'new' class method I for one would be happy for Gert to amend the text if he could make it clearer. Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=1609955&group_id=119701 |