From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-10-03 12:46:24
|
Feature Requests item #1700828, was opened at 2007-04-14 20:13 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bigrixx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1700828&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Classes >Group: v3.2.0 >Status: Pending Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Assigned to: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Summary: add a removeItem method to collection classes. Initial Comment: The collection classes could really use a removeItem method. Among other uses, it could really improve the algorithms of the set methods. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2007-06-20 10:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1125291 Originator: YES This added removeItem(item) to all collection classes. This will remove an item from the collection. The return value is the item removed. If an item exists under more than one index, the item removed is unspecified. Note: This also made the index argument to the RELATION removeItem() method optional. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2007-04-14 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1125291 Originator: YES This also made the second argument on the relation removeitem() method optional. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1700828&group_id=119701 |