Thanks both. Rick's suggestion to use class .Routine is probably the way forward in this case. I've had package in mind since it was recommended to me long time ago as a replacement for ::requires and simply thought that this is how you do it. I'll play with .routine instead :)


On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mark Miesfeld <> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Staffan Tylen <> wrote:
I'm fiddling with the .Package class and have found that if I create a new package from an array of rexx code, the new package is immediately executed by the init method. Is this the way it is supposed to work? Example:

a~append("say 'hi this is me'")
a~append("say 'bye'")

I haven't played with the .Package class much, but it says this in the doc:

The files loaded by ::REQUIRES are also contained in Package class instances.

So, I think that p = .Package~new()

is going to behave like:

::requires 'p.txt'

and if p.txt is

say 'hi this is me'
say 'bye'

Then when you require p.txt those 2 lines of code are going to run.  Which is what happens in your test.  Change your test to this

a~append("::routine speak public")
a~append("say 'hi this is me'")
a~append("say 'bye'")
a~append("return 0")
r = speak()

and try it.

Although I just did and it didn't work as I expected.  But, it is more like what I think should work.

Mark Miesfeld

Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
Oorexx-users mailing list