Hmmm, I really don't remember.  I didn't even realize there weren't compatible, and I can't think of any reasons why they wouldn't be.


On 11/15/05, Michael Lueck <> wrote:
Maybe mainly for Rick, but if someone else knows feel free to chime in first.

Rick, when you developed Object Rexx on OS/2, do you happen to remember what
caused for there to be an incompatibility between Classic and Object Rexx's

The way it exists today, (MCP2 or eCS 1.2, etc...) they have the same function
names in each, even the same version string in the DLL's. The size is radically
different however. C is 68K and O is 41K.

I find the fact that various people say the DLL's are not compatible with the
Rexx they are not intended for rather surprising. Just wondering what
background is known on this as ooRexxOS2 goes forward.


Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems

This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
Oorexx-devel mailing list