Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Python
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
ndurant
From: Brian <bri...@po...> - 2004-06-05 02:13:49
|
Neil-- No, but I'm willing to learn. Wouldn't it be better, though, if there was buy-in from the group? If the rest of the group wants to go the C route, then we're not going to accomplish an awful lot together. --Brian On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 03:02:28AM +0100, Neil Durant wrote: > Neil Durant wrote: > > I've been reading more about Python, and it really does look like a good > > implementation language for the OOPic compiler. I'd be all for going for > > it, but I'd really like to hear Andy's thoughts on it! > > > > I notice that you can call C functions from Python and vice versa, > > relatively easily, meaning that if there's anything we find we really need > > C for, then we can do it in C. Details here: > > > > <http://docs.python.org/ext/ext.html> > > > > I'm really keen to get on with development, but deciding on the > > implemntation language is pretty critical! > > > > Andy, are you still with us? > > Well, in the absense of any word from Andy about this, what do you all say > we go ahead and try this in Python? > > Brian, do you have any experience using those Python parsers and compiler > generators you mentioned? > > Neil > -- > Neil Durant > <nd...@us...> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one > installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > Oopic-compiler-devel mailing list > Oop...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oopic-compiler-devel > |