[Oopic-compiler-devel] Fw: OFFLIST: Request for compiler information
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
ndurant
From: D. D. M. <dd...@mc...> - 2004-05-06 01:12:49
|
You might each want to take your local snapshot of the page Scott has provided, in case this is a temporary URL. This confirms that my analysis I posted last week--using this will be much more convient than hard thinking for the byte-code reverse engineering. I'll now concentrate on the objects and the byte-code emitted as a result of script syntax examples. Also, I've requested the Access database, but it may not be much more than what was posted on the OOpic list a week or so ago (that link was http://www.oopic.com/ObjectPropListo.html). Daniel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Savage" <sms...@ho...> To: <dd...@mc...> Sent: Wednesday, 05 May 2004 13:18 Subject: RE: OFFLIST: Request for compiler information WAS: [oopic] Re: Oopic compiler issues - The low down. > I only check this email ever so often. > > Here is item 1 on your list. > http://www.oopic.com/OOPicObjectCommandList.html > > As for Item2, do you have Access 2k? If so I can send you item #2. > > -Scott Savage > > > >From: "D. Daniel McGlothin" <dd...@mc...> > >To: <sms...@ho...> > >CC: "D. Daniel McGlothin" <dd...@mc...> > >Subject: OFFLIST: Request for compiler information WAS: [oopic] Re: > >Oopic compiler issues - The low down. > >Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:25:38 -0400 > > > >Scott, > > > >You said: > > > >"If you guys want to put > >together a full blown C language compiler, you will have my full > >support. No need to reverse engineer the compiler. Just ask for > >whatever you need. I will release the native code instructions and > >the Object definitions for your developer's group." > > > >and a bit later: > > > >"No NDA necessary. I have been thinking about releasing the native > >language for some time." > > > > > >I thank you for your generous offer. > > > >On behalf of the group (https://sourceforge.net/projects/oopic-compiler), > >would you provide: > > > >1. native code instructions > >2. object definitions, with OOpic firmware levels each of supported at > >3. permission to package the OOPicMK.exe with the project (versions 3, 4, > >and 5) > >4. catalog of error messages generated by OOPicMK.exe > >5. algorithm or source for OOpicMK.exe > >6. permission to package corrections to the OOpic documentation, or > >alternatively, provide an electronic means of allowing us to send revisions > >of the same to you for psoting at www.oopic.com. > >7. any lists of bugs/annoyances/things-to-do for the OOpic toolchain that > >might be addressed in toolchain revisions. We are aware of Dennis Clark's > >buglist. > >8. list of deprecated and un-implemented objects > >9. a comment on your take as to whether the failure of the shift operation > >(Basic syntax << and >>) is a IDE, compiler, or a firmware issue. > >10. a comment on your take as to whether the problems with array elements > >beyond 4 or 5 is solely a compiler issue. > > > > > >I understand if you wish to keep any of the above 'under wraps' for > >whatever > >reason. Further, I'm aware that some of this information is included at > >www.oopic.com and in the released IDE, but if it is available in a more > >concise form, it would be appreciated. > > > >If you are aware of significant overlap of any effort between yourself and > >this project, perhaps we could assist you rather than working at > >cross-purposes. Please let me know if this is the case. > > > >Finally, congradulations on the Microchip arrangement, as well as the > >SpeakJet; and thanks for the peek at the visual virtual circuit editor you > >recently posted. > > > >Best regards, > >Daniel McGlothin > > > > > >PS, Understanding your position on e-mail, I'll post this by paper mail to > >the address listed at www.oopic.com if I do not get a reply of receipt > >within a couple of days. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stop worrying about overloading your inbox - get MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! > http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362ave/ direct/01/ > > > |