RE: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK compiler--preliminary

[D. D. M. <dd...@mc...>]

I went ahead and put the files originally attached at the URL
http://oopicide.mcglothin.info/OOpicCompilerReverseEngineering_ListOfFiles.asp


When updated, I'll mention it in a posting.

Andrew:
I haven't looked closely at what your tools did.  Do you essentially translate
the script in a preferred syntax into the OOpicMK syntax and then use the
compiler?

Or do you have your tools emit the OEX file directly--if so, then I'm wasting my
time.

Daniel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oop...@li...
> [mailto:oop...@li...]On Behalf Of D.
> Daniel McGlothin
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:03 AM
> To: oop...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK
> compiler--preliminary
>
>
> OK, ok, I did it.
>
>
> Attached is a (partial) disassembly of the bytecode stream and other files:
>     BasicSyntax.osc -- human readable byte-code listing
>     BASICSYNTAX.oex -- the HEX file of the above
>     BASICSYNTAX.Omp -- human readable object map
>     OOpic byte-codes generated by the OOpicMK compiler.xlr -- Microsoft
> Works spreadsheet disassembly notes
>     OOpic byte-codes generated by the OOpicMK compiler.xlr -- Microsoft
> Excel 95 version of the same.
>     OOpicMK_commandline.txt -- notes about the OOpicMK.exe operation
>
>
> If the spreadsheets are a problem, I'll render the stuff as a text file.
>
> Please take a look at the OEX file in a hex editor and see if the ASCII
> codes of the bytes match that shown in the second 'column' of the OSC
> (assembler listing).  I suspect it does.
>
> I'll do more landscaping this weekend, as well as prepare a devotional
> sermon for Sunday.  I'll plan to be back next week.
>
> BTW,
>
> I'm in Pennsylvania, US.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Porrett" <wa...@ic...>
> To: <oop...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 22:43
> Subject: Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK
> compiler--preliminary
>
>
> > At 03:35 AM 4/30/2004 +0100, Neil Durant wrote:
> >
> > >I had half an hour to kill earlier, so I finished the whole project off,
> > >just for kicks.  But then I accidentally deleted the folder containing
> all
> > >the code.  Sorry about that...
> >
> > That odd, I just had the same experience.  I guess it's up to Dan to do
> all
> > the work from this point on (it only seems fair...)
> >
> >
> > >Agreed, although anything we're collectively working on, collaboratively,
> > >might be better done via the site, otherwise we'll just spend all our
> time
> > >throwing attachments at each other and fixing up the differences.
> >
> > Agreed, but we're not there yet, so...
> >
> > Also, I suspect that we may end up just giving certain parts of the job to
> > one individual, so multiple users updating the same document may not be
> all
> > that common.  We'll see.
> >
> >
> > ...Andy
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oopic-compiler-devel mailing list
> > Oop...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oopic-compiler-devel
> >
>