Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK compiler--preliminary
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
ndurant
From: D. D. M. <dd...@mc...> - 2004-04-30 12:08:49
|
OK, ok, I did it. Attached is a (partial) disassembly of the bytecode stream and other files: BasicSyntax.osc -- human readable byte-code listing BASICSYNTAX.oex -- the HEX file of the above BASICSYNTAX.Omp -- human readable object map OOpic byte-codes generated by the OOpicMK compiler.xlr -- Microsoft Works spreadsheet disassembly notes OOpic byte-codes generated by the OOpicMK compiler.xlr -- Microsoft Excel 95 version of the same. OOpicMK_commandline.txt -- notes about the OOpicMK.exe operation If the spreadsheets are a problem, I'll render the stuff as a text file. Please take a look at the OEX file in a hex editor and see if the ASCII codes of the bytes match that shown in the second 'column' of the OSC (assembler listing). I suspect it does. I'll do more landscaping this weekend, as well as prepare a devotional sermon for Sunday. I'll plan to be back next week. BTW, I'm in Pennsylvania, US. Daniel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Porrett" <wa...@ic...> To: <oop...@li...> Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 22:43 Subject: Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK compiler--preliminary > At 03:35 AM 4/30/2004 +0100, Neil Durant wrote: > > >I had half an hour to kill earlier, so I finished the whole project off, > >just for kicks. But then I accidentally deleted the folder containing all > >the code. Sorry about that... > > That odd, I just had the same experience. I guess it's up to Dan to do all > the work from this point on (it only seems fair...) > > > >Agreed, although anything we're collectively working on, collaboratively, > >might be better done via the site, otherwise we'll just spend all our time > >throwing attachments at each other and fixing up the differences. > > Agreed, but we're not there yet, so... > > Also, I suspect that we may end up just giving certain parts of the job to > one individual, so multiple users updating the same document may not be all > that common. We'll see. > > > ...Andy > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Oopic-compiler-devel mailing list > Oop...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oopic-compiler-devel > |