Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK compiler--preliminary

[D. D. M. <dd...@mc...>]

OK, ok, I did it.


Attached is a (partial) disassembly of the bytecode stream and other files:
    BasicSyntax.osc -- human readable byte-code listing
    BASICSYNTAX.oex -- the HEX file of the above
    BASICSYNTAX.Omp -- human readable object map
    OOpic byte-codes generated by the OOpicMK compiler.xlr -- Microsoft
Works spreadsheet disassembly notes
    OOpic byte-codes generated by the OOpicMK compiler.xlr -- Microsoft
Excel 95 version of the same.
    OOpicMK_commandline.txt -- notes about the OOpicMK.exe operation


If the spreadsheets are a problem, I'll render the stuff as a text file.

Please take a look at the OEX file in a hex editor and see if the ASCII
codes of the bytes match that shown in the second 'column' of the OSC
(assembler listing).  I suspect it does.

I'll do more landscaping this weekend, as well as prepare a devotional
sermon for Sunday.  I'll plan to be back next week.

BTW,

I'm in Pennsylvania, US.

Daniel



----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Porrett" <wa...@ic...>
To: <oop...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 22:43
Subject: Re: [Oopic-compiler-devel] Reverse-engineering the OOpicMK
compiler--preliminary


> At 03:35 AM 4/30/2004 +0100, Neil Durant wrote:
>
> >I had half an hour to kill earlier, so I finished the whole project off,
> >just for kicks.  But then I accidentally deleted the folder containing
all
> >the code.  Sorry about that...
>
> That odd, I just had the same experience.  I guess it's up to Dan to do
all
> the work from this point on (it only seems fair...)
>
>
> >Agreed, although anything we're collectively working on, collaboratively,
> >might be better done via the site, otherwise we'll just spend all our
time
> >throwing attachments at each other and fixing up the differences.
>
> Agreed, but we're not there yet, so...
>
> Also, I suspect that we may end up just giving certain parts of the job to
> one individual, so multiple users updating the same document may not be
all
> that common.  We'll see.
>
>
> ...Andy
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Oopic-compiler-devel mailing list
> Oop...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oopic-compiler-devel
>